April 15, 2006 12:51 AM
DemDachsund, channeling you know who: "It's hard to know. After all there are known knowns, unknown knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns."
So why isn't Rumsfeld being fired? (04.15.2006)
Next Entry: Insane. (04.18.2006)
Previous Entry: The Nukuhlar Option (04.12.2006)
Dave E.:
Digby knows why:
"Bush's Secret War-
I really think it's possible that Bush and Rummy have already got a secret war going on, one that has not been revealed to congress in any form. It's designed that way. Bush is not going to fire Rummy --- he can't. He's already committed himself to this thing. This could be the ultimate action of the unitary executive."
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_digbysblog_archive.html#114504674614060703and:
"Black Reconnaissance -
It's obvious to me that this call for Rumsfeld's resignation by six generals is about stopping this operation in Iran first and foremost. It is not a coincidence that the first salvo came from Sy Hersh last Sunday
[...]
The problem may be that Bush can't replace the person who is running his secret war."
http://www.digbysblog.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_digbysblog_archive.html#114504197724915416It's persuasive (and frightening) reasoning, but it seems all too plausible given what we know.
Anyway, hope you're doing well Jim.
Sat Apr 15 2006 3:01 AM
jesse:
i think rumsfeld should be fired cuz of all the events that have happened in iraq like abu grahib and so on
Tue May 2 2006 8:53 PM
Email:
   
|
  
 |
